Thinking about this again and I think when these tools encounter ambiguity, from the perspective of their logic when there's no way to verify correctness from the training data, instead of coming back to the human and asking them to make a judgment they keep cycling or hallucinate an "answer"
The traditional way of resolving this would be for the human to make a choice they take responsibility for, but since these tools are partially accountability sinks they're not designed for that
Sue Smith
npub1ck…rheck
2026-04-04 10:14:16 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…vdff
Author Public Key
npub1ck5ctxe2ppjfl2hwu8w7y80r5swt0ldrxxj6hgk2ed4pcfdkjvyq2rheckSeen on
wss://relay.ditto.pubPublished at
2026-04-04 10:14:16 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "aa8466ab57be06723577f5fbce0328fcd305836d757ecc99e10e68ede63b18c8",
"pubkey": "c5a9859b2a08649faaeee1dde21de3a41cb7fda331a5aba2cacb6a1c25b69308",
"created_at": 1775297656,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"06e8ed59e5f7dbfb05282c5899916ef25d9796f0871e8812403e013fce659d00",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://glasgow.social/users/sue/statuses/116345907193849190",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub"
]
],
"content": "Thinking about this again and I think when these tools encounter ambiguity, from the perspective of their logic when there's no way to verify correctness from the training data, instead of coming back to the human and asking them to make a judgment they keep cycling or hallucinate an \"answer\"\n\nThe traditional way of resolving this would be for the human to make a choice they take responsibility for, but since these tools are partially accountability sinks they're not designed for that",
"sig": "08cb9140b04391650801cbaeabd6d6789e28094573d5742e63be95d4a71825908676a980dbc96d0ac2e027718711556fb725087dae844a04051bbd0ef4cfa41f"
}