Your news was full of "firsts"
If you do that you ought to include the relevant timeline context
Please help improve the landscape of social media news
We are on an impactful path of getting to better fission reactors but obscuring the path could make people think they're interested in something that happened recently that actually happened a decade ago.
Now that you're probably fuming and want me to fill in the gaps, please also recognize that while I noticed a gap that doesn't mean I know all the other gaps. You reported on the Chinese reactor I mentioned? Well, what else did you report on that you should have mentioned?