Join Nostr
2026-10-27 18:28:14 UTC
in reply to

Jackk on Nostr: I don’t think it’s irrational to state that for classical (binary) physics to ...

I don’t think it’s irrational to state that for classical (binary) physics to exist, there cannot logically be a double spend at ANY unit of Planck time from Genesis to present.

If you have another solution to the double spend problem other than a quantized block of time, then the world needs to hear it. Please make Bitcoin work without the block.

Quantum theory has a fiat problem of energy/information/time baked in to its core assumptions. Big Physics has not computed a quantum/block to even understand what the measurement boundary must be and why the double spend problem must be resolved in logic/information. How can you even reason about what a pre-measured (quantum) state means without the measurement?

If Bitcoin isn’t your answer, you’re wrong. Bitcoin is the proof, your flawed understanding of Bitcoin is not my responsibility to right.

Again, please tell me why Bitcoin is not physics.